Microsoft to spend Stac View regarding $120 Billion

81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles to own Piece of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Take care of Disagreement; Microsoft Eventually Pays Right up, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.

83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically due to the fact Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.

85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).

86 Get a hold of Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not so Marvelous, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).

88 Don Clark, Microsoft to order Intuit When you look at the Stock Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, App Contract Shakes Up Family Banking, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).

89 Michelle Flores, Asks for Much more information, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Renders 1000s of dollars; Can it Profile treating It?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.

91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; pick in addition to, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).

92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Grip Towards Application Tightened up From the Antitrust Price, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).

93 See John M. Goodman, Brand new Dos Heavyweights Go Several other Round, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-type Madness? Integration Coping with Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop computer 2 6.3: 2 and you can 2: Broke up Within Beginning, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).

Probe out-of Microsoft try Extended – Fairness Dept

94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s The brand new Deals Ideas Draw Problems, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).

96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).


99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See Michael Morris, Microsoft Offer: A lack of, Too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)

a hundred Joseph Farrell, Huntsman K. Monroe and you will Garth Saloner, The brand new Straight Business Of Community and you can Possibilities Competition Instead of Component Battle, October 1994 (performing papers).

101 Discover, age.g., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)